

“It’s really optimized and developed for players that are at slower clubhead speeds,” Schweigert says. These clubs were designed with beginning golfers in mind, engineering them to help hit the ball as high and straight as possible. There are even clubs in this line that cater to weekend warriors in the form of the 0211 Z set-a notion that would’ve been unthinkable in the past for a high-end brand like PXG. PXG also placed a single weight on the rear of the sole to move the center of gravity back to achieve a higher launch. The 0211s are made for golfers who want more speed and forgiveness, and they deliver on their promise thanks to a Ti412 face material that produces a spring-like effect for higher ball speeds. The extra bells and whistles-and added customization-that have come to define PXG are absent. There are some key differences between the flagship products and the 0211s, though. It’s a very high-quality product-especially considering the price point in which it’s positioned.” “We use the same body material and face material, as well as a carbon-fiber construction on the crown. “A lot of the technology is a carryover from some of our flagship products,” Schweigert says. All feature PXG’s honeycomb TPE inserts, thin club faces and adjustable weighting.
ICE DRIVER REVIEW DRIVERS
The line was initially launched in 2019 with the introduction of more affordable irons, too, and in 2021 the family of clubs was expanded to include new drivers plus fairway woods and hybrids.įor PXG aficionados, the technology packed into the 0211 family of woods will be familiar. “We said, ‘Hey, let’s create a really high-quality product but do it in a way where price isn’t a huge roadblock,’ ” says PXG’s chief product officer Brad Schweigert.Īnd so, the 0211 drivers were born.

The results have led to a cultlike following-and a lot of game-changing tech.Įight years later, that mission remains the same.However, PXG has now expanded its product line to cater not only to those with deep wallets. No matter the price tag, Bob Parsons’ company has always aimed to make the highest performing clubs on the market. PXG and luxury have been synonymous since the upstart club manufacturer’s founding in 2014. Want to overhaul your bag for 2022? Find a fitting location near you at GOLF’s affiliate company True Spec Golf.
ICE DRIVER REVIEW FULL
You can find the full list of ClubTest driver reviews here. Below you will find our deep dive into PXG’s newest drivers, including full reviews and test results toward the bottom of the page. To help you make sense of the mountain of high-tech new clubs on the market, we put all of the latest offerings from the top golf club manufacturers to the ultimate test, making use of a state-of-the-art swing robot to put each club through its paces. This year’s ClubTest is bigger and better than ever. It might have been that we would've had to take a lock on each Tx/Rx ring to get the counter values, and that didn't seem like a good idea.Īll that said, these were intended to help debug problems and validate that the hardware checksums were working if it seems like there might be more harm than good or if they need to be reimplemented, it might be easier to just leave it out or have it compiled out upstream.Read our complete reviews of PXG drivers below. We also did have an implementation that actually periodically collected the stats from each queue (in the update_admin_status() function I think) and it added each queue counter to the VSI (so that we could just stick with uint64_t's), but I think that ran into some other problem. Though, thinking about the per CPU memory usage, it might not be that bad to keep them in a per-queue struct. We could've stored each counter in each queue, but I think we were concerned about how much memory that could use and how it could be annoying to see what's incremented across many queues. The counter(9) functionality looked like it would get around that requirement. We're incrementing the stats in the hot path, so we didn't want to take some sort of per-VSI lock to protect the counters while they're being incremented. From what I can remember, it was motivated by how we were storing these per-queue stats in the VSI struct instead of storing them in each queue struct.
